Right or Wrong?

There seem to be so many big trials going on these days.. the huang na case, the hong mei case and this NKF one.. Didn't realise that NKF was having a trial till today when it was published big big in the Straits Times.

Hmm, the CEO drawing 25000 per month with bonuses of 10 months' pay.. and they are always claiming they need money to save patients.. what are the TV stars practising so hard, risking their limbs (and sometimes lives) for? And like what Mr Davinder Singh said... What is the man who draws $1000 a month but donates $50 because he wanted to help the poor patients donating to? So that this T.T. guy can earn 1.8 million in 3 years? when it can actually provide dialysis for a patient for 900 months?

I have to admit i'm a bit 兴灾乐祸.. happy that this man is in a fix now that he is in this trial.. (maybe i didn't like his face.. or maybe i didn't really like the way NKF was doing things sometimes) I get their donation card every year, and sometimes donate to the shows.. though everytime i feel a bit reluctant cos they don't seem to be heading in the right direction of helping patients but going towards making their centers look luxurious.. But everytime i will 心软 when i think of patients who need to think how to save for the next meal (unlike me who think of saving for dive trips or the sorts..)

But i wonder what's next.. will they change CEO? what happens to the money he gets? Is there a law to get the dough from him and channel them back to the patients?

Then again there's the question that all donations are voluntary.. When a donation is made means that the person trusts that the organisation will use the money to help the patients. So does it mean that as long as patients are given help and they can live on then the company can use the money for their own? And what will the ideal salary of the CEO be so that the donors will be happy? $3000 a month? Can it please everybody?

Hmm.. so what's right and what's wrong?